Every RERAScore trust score is computed algorithmically from publicly filed RERA data. Below are the exact rules — every point awarded, every deduction applied.
Every project gets a score from 0 to 100. That total is the sum of 6 dimensions, each contributing a fixed share. The diagram below shows how the 100 points are allocated — not how any specific project scored. Project-specific scores live on each project page; the score-to-tier mapping is in the next section.
How the 100-point total is allocated
| Range | Label | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 85 - 100 | Excellent | Mandatory filings current; typically zero or all-resolved complaints; strong on-time delivery record |
| 70 - 84 | Reliable | Good compliance with minor gaps, generally on track |
| 50 - 69 | Average | Mixed signals — some strengths, some concerns worth investigating |
| 30 - 49 | Concerning | Multiple red flags, significant delays or complaint history |
| 0 - 29 | High Risk | Severe compliance failures, lapsed registration, or major legal issues |
A worked example shows how a real project ends up in a tier. This is an illustrative reconstruction using the actual rules above:
Project: A mid-sized residential project in Pune, registered in 2020 with an original completion date of 2023. Currently ongoing, 15 months overdue, one deadline extension filed. 2 consumer complaints on record (both resolved). All standard documents filed including sanctioned plans and title deed. RERA bank account, IFSC, and bank name all on file. Registration form fully filled and approved. GPS coordinates submitted. 3 RERA-registered agents attached, 2 currently active.
| Delivery — 12-36mo overdue band: 10 pts; extension penalty: −4 | 6 / 30 |
| Documents — 5 base + 6 critical types × 2.5 | 20 / 20 |
| Legal Risk — 2 complaints (−4) | 16 / 20 |
| Financial — bank account + IFSC + name + active + fees | 10 / 10 |
| Registration — full form + approved + proforma + GPS | 9 / 10 |
| Agent Network — base + 2 active + company type | 10 / 10 |
| Total | 71 / 100 — Reliable |
Interpretation: solid compliance and filings, but delivery delays drag the score down. A buyer looking at this project should probe the delay explanation and review the complaint resolution history before committing.
Being explicit about scope is part of honesty. A trust score is a compliance signal, not a complete buying decision. The following factors are outside our scoring and require independent diligence:
For each dimension below, the exact point bands used by our scoring engine are listed. The rules are the same across all states; only the input data differs. Bands and weights are subject to revision as the methodology improves — material changes will be dated on this page.
On-time delivery performance, scored directly from the project's RERA-registered timeline. Completed projects score full marks; lapsed projects score zero; ongoing projects are scored against their original declared completion date.
| Lapsed registration | 0 pts |
| Status = Completed | 30 pts |
| Ongoing, on track (original end date in the future) | 20 pts |
| Ongoing, no completion date on file | 15 pts |
| Overdue by < 12 months | 15 pts |
| Overdue by 12-36 months | 10 pts |
| Overdue by 36-60 months | 5 pts |
| Overdue by 60+ months | 0 pts |
| Additional deduction if deadline was extended from the original | −4 pts |
Completeness of mandatory RERA document uploads. We give base credit for any filed documents and reward the filing of critical document types (approved plans, sanctioned layouts, title deeds, commencement certificates, and equivalents per state). Base credit and critical-type credit stack — a single document can count toward both buckets.
| Any documents filed (base credit) | +1 pt per document, up to +5 |
| Each critical document type filed (8 types tracked) | +2.5 pts, up to +15 |
| Maximum total (base + critical, capped) | 20 pts |
Exposure from complaints, warrants, and litigation on record with the RERA authority. Starts at 20 and deducts for each adverse signal.
| Starting score | 20 pts |
| Each consumer complaint | −2 pts (up to −8) |
| Each warrant / enforcement action | −3 pts (up to −6) |
| Each litigation on record | −1.5 pts (up to −6) |
| Each High Court case | −1 additional pt |
| Each preventive injunction / interim order | −3 additional pts |
| Floor | 0 pts |
Compliance with the RERA Act's financial-disclosure requirements — chiefly the designated escrow/separate bank account mandated under Section 4(2)(l)(D), bank verification details, and whether registration fees are paid in full.
| Designated RERA bank account declared | +3 pts |
| IFSC code on record | +2 pts |
| Bank name on record | +2 pts |
| Account marked active | +1 pt |
| Registration fees paid in full | +2 pts |
| Maximum total | 10 pts |
Completeness and integrity of the RERA registration itself — whether the application form was filled in full, whether it was formally approved, whether proforma declarations are on file, and whether GPS coordinates have been submitted.
| Registration form fully filled | +4 pts (partial = +1) |
| Registration approved by regulator | +1 pt |
| Proforma declaration filed | +2 pts |
| No deviation from declared plan | +1 pt |
| GPS coordinates submitted | +2 pts |
| Maximum total | 10 pts |
Number and currency of RERA-registered real estate agents attached to the project. This is a liquidity/activity signal, not a quality signal — projects with zero registered agents are often lapsed or inactive. We deliberately cap the points so that aggressive broker rosters cannot inflate the score.
| Zero registered agents | 0 pts |
| Base credit for any registered agent | +4 pts |
| Each active agent (registration not expired) | +2 pts, up to +4 |
| At least one company-type (vs. individual) agent | +2 pts |
| Maximum total | 10 pts |
Every data point used for scoring comes from a publicly accessible RERA portal. No scraped social content, no aggregator resale, no private data. Last sync across all sources: March 2026.
Data quality varies by state. Maharashtra and Gujarat publish the most structured data (including complaints and litigation); other states publish subsets. Missing data does not imply absence — it simply means the signal was not available at sync time.
Each project receives a 0-100 score computed from 6 weighted dimensions: Delivery (max 30), Documents (max 20), Legal Risk (max 20), Financial Transparency (max 10), Registration Quality (max 10), and Agent Network (max 10). Each dimension has concrete point bands — see the Dimension Details section on this page for the exact rules.
No. We do not accept any payment from builders, promoters, or their representatives for score changes, removals, or favorable treatment. Every score is computed algorithmically from publicly filed RERA data. If you ever suspect otherwise, write to disputes@rerascore.in and we will investigate.
Corrections are welcome when the underlying RERA data is wrong. Builders should first update the filing with their state RERA authority, then email disputes@rerascore.in with the RERA registration number and a link to the corrected filing. We refresh scores on a rolling basis and the updated data will be reflected in the next sync.
The RERA registry is the source of truth for our scoring. If the portal data is wrong, the correction must first happen on the state RERA portal — we cannot override filed data. Once the portal is corrected, email us the updated RERA number and we will re-score on the next data sync.
No. Scores are compliance signals based on filed data, not guarantees. A high score means the builder has demonstrated strong compliance, disclosure, and delivery history; it does not certify future performance and it does not replace your own legal, financial, or physical due diligence.
Low scores often stem from incomplete RERA filings, missed quarterly progress reports, unresolved complaints, or lapsed registrations — not necessarily project-quality issues. Each project page lists the specific signals driving its score so you can see exactly where it gained or lost points.
Data is refreshed from state RERA portals on a rolling basis; the current dataset reflects filings as of March 2026. The "Last updated" date on each project page tells you when that specific project was last synced.
Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Telangana, and Uttar Pradesh. We are expanding as additional state RERA portals publish structured data.
No. RERAScore is an independent aggregator. We only use publicly accessible RERA filings. Scores are informational and are not endorsed by any regulator.
Spot an error or have a score dispute? Email disputes@rerascore.in. We aim to acknowledge every report within 7 business days; resolution time depends on whether the underlying RERA portal data needs to be corrected first.
About RERAScore and how this methodology was developed: Read more on the About page.
Data as of March 2026.