Every RERAScore trust score is computed algorithmically from publicly available RERA filing data. Here is exactly how it works.
Overview
Each project receives a score from 0 to 100, computed as the sum of 6 weighted dimensions. The weights reflect the relative importance of each factor in predicting project reliability:
Good compliance with minor gaps, generally on track
50 - 69
Average
Mixed signals — some strengths, some concerns worth investigating
30 - 49
Concerning
Multiple red flags, significant delays or complaint history
0 - 29
High Risk
Severe compliance failures, lapsed registration, or major legal issues
Dimension Details
Delivery
30 points max
Measures on-time delivery performance. Factors include: completion percentage vs. expected timeline, history of deadline extensions, and whether previous project phases were delivered on schedule.
Key Signals
Completion percentage relative to original deadline
Number of deadline extensions requested
Previous phase delivery track record
Time elapsed since registration vs. stated completion date
Documents
20 points max
Evaluates the completeness and timeliness of mandatory RERA document filings. Projects that maintain up-to-date documentation demonstrate regulatory compliance and transparency.
Key Signals
Number of required documents uploaded
Quarterly progress report submission regularity
Financial audit report currency
Technical specifications completeness
Legal Risk
20 points max
Assesses legal exposure based on complaint and litigation history. Projects with fewer complaints and no adverse RERA orders score higher.
Key Signals
Total complaint count filed with RERA
Complaint resolution rate
Active vs. resolved complaints
RERA orders or directives against the project
Financial
10 points max
Reviews financial transparency indicators from RERA filings, including bank account status and financial statement submissions.
Key Signals
Designated bank account verification
Financial statement submission status
Cost estimation accuracy
Fund utilization disclosure
Registration
10 points max
Evaluates the quality of RERA registration, including timely renewals, accurate information, and compliance with amendment requirements.
Key Signals
Registration renewal timeliness
Information accuracy and completeness
Amendment filing compliance
Promoter information verification
Agent Network
10 points max
Uses the number of registered real estate agents actively selling the project as a proxy for market confidence and project viability.
Key Signals
Number of RERA-registered agents for the project
Agent registration recency
Market activity level relative to district average
Data Sources
All data used for scoring comes from publicly accessible RERA portals:
MahaRERA (maharerait.maharashtra.gov.in) — Maharashtra projects, builders, complaints, and documents
Karnataka RERA (rera.karnataka.gov.in) — Karnataka project data
UP-RERA (up-rera.in) — Uttar Pradesh project data
Limitations & Disclaimers
Not legal or financial advice. Scores are informational tools, not certifications or guarantees.
Data freshness. Scores reflect the most recent data available at time of extraction. Current data is from March 2026.
Incomplete data. Some projects may have missing filings or incomplete information, which can lower their score even if the project is performing well.
No physical verification. Scores are based entirely on filed data, not physical site inspections.
State-specific nuances. RERA requirements vary slightly by state. Scores within a state are directly comparable; cross-state comparisons should be made with this context in mind.
